BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Fotostore Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2005] UKVAT V19255 (21 September 2005)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2005/V19255.html
Cite as: [2005] UKVAT V19255

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]



     

    19255

    LONDON TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: LON/2005/527

    Copy sent to:

    Appellant/Applicant

    Respondents

    Appellant
    FOTOSTORE LIMITED

    - and -

    HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents

    Tribunal: RODNEY D HUGGINS (Chairman)

    Sitting in Public in London on 14 September 2005

    DIRECTION

    Under Rule 30(8)

    This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a surcharge assessment dated 28 January 2005 in the sum of £1888,49 and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day

    AND UPON HEARING Mr Peter Phago, Managing Director for the Appellant and Mrs Pauline Crennon of the Solicitor's office of HM Revenue and Excise for the Respondents

    AND THIS TRIBUNAL heaving heard this appeal and having announced its decision

    AND the Appellant and the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the said Rules

    THIS TRIBUNAL finds that the Appellant does have a reasonable excuse for the default which resulted in the Respondents making the assessment under appeal

    AND THIS TRIBUNAL DIRECTS that this appeal is allowed because of the sudden illness of a vital employee just before the due date for submitting the return and paying the tax

    AND that there is to be no direction as to costs

    RODNEY D. HUGGINS
    Chairman
    Release Date: 21 September 2005


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2005/V19255.html