BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Leeds Wholesale Flowers Ltd v Revenue and Customs [2006] UKVAT V19489 (07 March 2006) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2006/V19489.html Cite as: [2006] UKVAT V19489 |
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
Leeds Wholesale Flowers Ltd v Revenue and Customs [2006] UKVAT V19489 (07 March 2006)
19489
MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: MAN/05/0759
LEEDS WHOLESALE FLOWERS LIMITED Appellant
and
THE COMMISSIONERS FOR
HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents
Tribunal Chairman: Richard Barlow
Sitting in public in Manchester on the 14 February 2006
DIRECTION
under Rule 30(8)
This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to surcharge assessments dated the 16 July 2004; 14 January 2005 and 15 July 2005 in the sums of £484.18; £180.00 and £750.00 and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day
And upon hearing Mr Ian McDougall for the Appellant and Miss Joanne Vicary of counsel for the Respondents
And this tribunal having heard this appeal and having announced its decision
And the Appellant and the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to the rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the said Rules
This tribunal finds that the Appellant does not have a reasonable excuse for the default which resulted in the Respondents making the assessment under appeal
And this tribunal directs that this appeal is dismissed
And that there is to be no direction as to costs
RICHARD BARLOW
CHAIRMAN
Release Date: 7 March 2006
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2006