BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Kalro Building and Construction Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2006] UKVAT V19747 (25 August 2006)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2006/V19747.html
Cite as: [2006] UKVAT V19747

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]



     

    19747

    MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: MAN/06/388

    KALRO BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION LTD Appellant

    and

    THE COMMISSIONERS FOR

    HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents

    Tribunal Chairman: Lady Mitting

    Sitting in public in Manchester on the 21 August 2006

    DIRECTION

    under Rule 30(8)

    This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a penalty assessment dated the 11 May 2006 in the sum of £4,436 and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day

    And upon hearing Mr R Critchlow for the Appellant and Mr B Haley of Solicitor's office for HM Revenue and Customs for the Respondents

    And this tribunal having heard this appeal and having announced its decision

    And the Appellant and the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to the rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the said Rules

    This tribunal finds that:-

    (i) In relation to that element of the penalty (£3,944) relating to September 2002, the Appellant does not have a reasonable excuse but the penalty should be mitigated by 75%
    (ii) In relation to the balance of £492 in respect of December 2003, the Appellant does have a reasonable excuse

    And this tribunal directs that this appeal is allowed in part

    And that there is to be no direction as to costs

    LADY MITTING
    CHAIRMAN
    Release Date: 25 August 2006
    © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2006


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2006/V19747.html