BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Keyes Transport Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2006] UKVAT V19800 (05 October 2006)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2006/V19800.html
Cite as: [2006] UKVAT V19800

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Keyes Transport Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2006] UKVAT V19800 (05 October 2006)

     
    19800

    LONDON TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: LON/2006/0816

    Copy sent to:

    Appellant/Applicant

    Respondents

    KEYES TRANSPORT LTD Appellant

    - and -

    THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents

    Tribunal: MICHAEL JOHNSON (Chairman)

    SHEILA WONG CHONG FRICS

    Sitting in public in London on 29 September 2006

    DIRECTION

    under Rule 30(8)

    THIS APPEAL against a decision of the Respondents with respect to the imposition of a Default Surcharge and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 (as amended) ("the rules") coming on for hearing this day

    AND UPON HEARING Peter Keyes, director of the Appellant and Jonathan Holl, of the Solicitor's office of HM Revenue and Customs for the Respondents

    AND THIS TRIBUNAL having heard this appeal and having announced its decision

    AND THE Appellant and the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to Rule 30(8) of the rules that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with Rule 30(1) of the said Rules

    THIS TRIBUNAL FINDS THAT no reasonable excuse has been shown to the satisfaction of the Tribunal for the tax shown on the Appellant's VAT return for the quarter ended 31 March 2006 not having been despatched so as to be received by the Respondents within the appropriate time limit

    AND THIS TRIBUNAL ACCORDINGLY DIRECTS THAT this appeal is DISMISSED

    MICHAEL JOHNSON

    Chairman

    Release Date: 5 October 2006

    © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2006


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2006/V19800.html