[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	United Kingdom Journals
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Journals >> John Zeleznikow and Dan Hunter,<B> </B><I>Building Intelligent Legal Information Systems: Representation and Reasoning in Law URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/other/journals/WebJCLI/1996/issue2/aiken2.html Cite as: John Zeleznikow and Dan Hunter,<B> </B><I>Building Intelligent Legal Information Systems: Representation and Reasoning in Law

[New search] [Help]

John Zeleznikow and Dan Hunter, Building Intelligent Legal Information Systems: Representation and Reasoning in Law

Reviewed by Michael Aikenhead

Copyright © 1996 Michael Aikenhead.
First Published in Web Journal of Current Legal Issues in association with Blackstone Press Ltd.

"It is our view that no legal professional of the twenty-first century can afford to be without automated legal support systems. To help provide professionals with useful advice we have written this book to cut away some of the hype, frenzy, misinformation and mystique about intelligent legal support systems. It is our aim to destroy the myths and fears lawyers have about computers (p 1)."

In their Introduction, Zeleznikow and Hunter state their aim as "to destroy the myths and fears lawyers have about computers". A facetious response might be: "Lawyers have nothing to fear from automation, who would want to build a robot that didn't do anything?" Building Intelligent Legal Information Systems provides a more constructive response. By providing a good overview of, and a solid introduction to, the field of artificial intelligence (AI) and law, to the AI theories and techniques relevant to law, to the uses to which these have been put in the law and to the possibilities for using these techniques in law in the future, the potential and limits of AI in the law are made apparent and such fears quickly dispelled. As the book progresses it becomes clear that lawyers' fears, such as "I will soon be replaced by a machine" are utterly groundless. It is with more than mild understatement that the authors conclude that even some of the most sophisticated AI systems in law, such as HYPO (pp 190-3), cannot be considered "the answer to all our prayers" (p 196). Nor conversely, should they be the basis for fear.

Building Intelligent Legal Information Systems is divided into three Sections, each with a different aim and a potentially different audience. Section One is titled "Fundamental concepts" and provides an introductory examination of: the legal and computer science issues which are necessary background for the construction of intelligent legal support tools; the tools that lawyers require; and the ability of computer science to deliver those tools. It examines the tasks lawyers perform and what computer tools are currently used in the automation of these tasks, including: case management tools, litigation support tools, databases, information retrieval systems and expert systems. While each of these tools could potentially benefit from the infusion of AI techniques, a majority of research in the field of AI and law has focused on information retrieval and expert systems. It is to these topics that the rest of the book is similarly confined. In this context, the remainder of Section One is a jurisprudential examination of the feasibility of developing AI tools in the legal domain. It concludes that there are no theoretical barriers (although as is shown later in the book, there are many practical barriers) to creating intelligent legal information systems.

Section Two, "Representation and reasoning", is the substantive technically oriented section of the book. It provides an introduction to the AI concepts and techniques needed to acquire, represent and reason with legal knowledge. It introduces the various knowledge representation strategies including logic and production rules ,(1) networks(2) and frames.(3) The representation of legal knowledge using each of these techniques and the process of reasoning with that knowledge are illustrated through the use of numerous carefully constructed examples and through discussion of many major existing AI systems in the legal domain such as TAXMAN, the British Nationality Act project, HYPO, CABARET, GREBE, PROLEXS, SCALIR and the authors' own IKBALS systems.

The final Section of the book, "Future tools", considers issues relevant to the construction of commercial intelligent legal support tools and considers possible future approaches to overcoming some of the limitations that exist in present systems. A brief survey of commercially available programming languages and shells(4) is provided, though they are predominantly aimed at rule based representations of law, as well as a brief discussion of the use of hypertext. The final substantive Chapter of the book examines the relevance to law of more "exotic" issues in AI, such as machine learning, neural networks, providing explanations and uncertain reasoning.

Together, these three Sections provide an excellent introduction to existing legal knowledge representation and reasoning techniques and existing systems in law that implement these ideas.

In their Introduction, the authors state that their book will appeal to a number of audiences, legal practitioners, legal students and computer professionals. In assessing this claim, it must be appreciated that, while the book provides a good overall introduction to the application of AI techniques in the law, it is (and only claims to be) an introduction to the field. Other texts exist that provide a more detailed examination of many of the topics covered. For example Wahlgren (1992) has undertaken a detailed jurisprudential examination of the possibility of using artificial intelligence to automate legal reasoning. He provides a detailed jurisprudential analysis of the process of legal reasoning and the prospect of using AI to emulate it. Similarly, Susskind (1989) has provided an extensive analysis of the possibility of using AI techniques, particularly formal logic, to automate legal tasks. Gardner (1987) covers similar ground to Susskind. Ashley's (1990) work is a detailed examination and implementation of a case based reasoning system in the legal domain. The work of Salton and McGill (1983) examines information retrieval. Various journal articles, and papers from the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law examine other topics covered, including the use of neural networks in law and rule induction. All provide far more detailed and in depth analysis of many of the issues discussed than Building Intelligent Legal Information Systems.

However, the fact that more detailed works on specific aspects of the use of AI techniques in law exist should not detract from the usefulness of this work. Indeed it is the very fact that it covers such wide ground in an introductory manner that is its attraction. For those new to the area of AI and law, the lack of a broad based introductory text makes entering the area a daunting task. With no conceptual framework with which to explore the field, the initiate is left to search articles, books and conference proceedings, to try and build his or her own framework. The initiate has to read and re-read in an effort simply to discover the major concepts and vocabulary of the field. A task made all the more difficult by the interdisciplinary nature of the topic and by the fact that many of the texts in the field deal exclusively with the detailed technical and jurisprudential issues relevant to the particular area being researched. Only once this labyrinth of material has been negotiated, a framework has been absorbed, and the major concepts and vocabulary learnt, can more detailed learning begin.

Zeleznikow and Hunter's book seeks to alleviate this situation. By providing a wide ranging introduction to the use of AI in law: from the AI techniques used, to the jurisprudential issues and problems affecting the use of AI in law, to the existing applications (indeed for those new to the field, this up-to date collection and examination of existing applications would be useful in itself), and to the languages and shells (supra, footnote 4) used to build systems, the novice is that much better, and more quickly equipped to begin more detailed reading and research into their particular area of interest. The task is made easier by the commendable inclusion of a glossary and by the comprehensive referencing in each Chapter to more detailed writings on the subject under discussion. Alternatively, for those who simply want a taste of what this emerging field offers, this book provides the easiest path to an overall appreciation.

Mital and Johnson (1992) perhaps provide the most similar investigation of the uses of AI in law. However, Mital and Johnson's book differs in two significant respects. First, it places far less emphasis on the jurisprudential issues relevant to the use of AI in law and secondly, the discussion of technical issues relevant to the use of AI in law is often disappointingly scant. In this respect then, Building Intelligent Legal Information Systems is unique in its provision of such a comprehensive introduction to the field of AI and law, both from the legal and the technical point of view.

Building Intelligent Legal Information Systems is a highly worthwhile introduction to the field of AI and law. By providing lawyers with simple and accessible explanations of AI it should help dispel their fears about technology while the associated jurisprudential discussion should help dispel any myth in the wider audience that lawyers do not do anything!

Ashley, K (1990) Modelling legal argument: reasoning with cases and hypotheticals (MIT Press).

Gardner, A v d L (1987) An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning (MIT Press).

Mital, V and Johnson, L (1992) Advanced Information Systems for Lawyers (Chapman & Hall).

Salton, G and McGill, MJ (1983) Introduction to modern information retrieval (McGraw Hill).

Susskind, R (1989) Expert Systems in Law: a jurisprudential inquiry (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

Wahlgren, P (1992) Automation of Legal Reasoning (Kluwer).

"If then ".
For example the hypothetical rule
"If you drive while drunk then you will lose your licence"
can be represented as
"If drunk(person) and drive(person) then licence_loss(person)"

Back to text

(2) For example a "semantic network" (a network which represents meanings between facts and concepts) to represent citizenship may look like the following:

(p 141). Back to text

(3) Frames are a means to represent hierarchical knowledge about a subject. For example, frames to represent knowledge about taxpayers may look like the following:

(p 152). Back to text

(4) A shell is "a tool for developing expert systems that consist of an expert system development language integrated into an extensive support environment" (p 170). Back to text