BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Whittinghame v Hatelie. [1650] 1 Brn 474 (23 January 1650) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1650/Brn010474-1279.html |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by ROBERT MACGILL, LORD FOORD.
Whittinghame
v.
Hatelie
1650 .January 23 and24 .Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In the suspension, Whittinghame against Hatelie, the reason bearing, that the charger had disponed and assigned the 1000 merks contained in the decreet, was not found relevant, suppose that yearly rent disponed indefinite, not determinating the time from the which the said disposition should begin; because, long before the said disposition, the charger, as executrix-creditrix, had confirmed the household gear, and meddled with the same for payment of that year. And far less did the reason, upon the foresaid meddling or intromitting, elide the second part of the charge, which was for satisfaction to her of her cautionary; since that intromission paid the other sum. So the letters were found orderly proceeded upon the decreet against the tenants of Whittinghame; who alleged, also, that they had paid to a factor: but that was premature, before the time of payment, and after the decease of the constituent; quod non jure factum, quia, mortuo mandatore, expirat mandatum.
Page 178.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
