BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> George Maxwell and Others, v Adam Gib. [1785] Mor 1113 (17 November 1785) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1785/Mor0301113-188.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 BANKRUPT.
Subject_2 DIVISION III. Decisions upon the act 5th Parliament 1696, declaring Notour Bankrupts.
Subject_3 SECT. I. Circumstances which infer Notour Bankruptcy.
Date: George Maxwell and Others,
v.
Adam Gib
17 November 1785
Case No.No 188.
The apprehending of an insolvent debtor without imprisonment, or taking into custody, held to be insufficient to qualify the statutory bankruptcy.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Maxwell, and other creditors of Ebenezer M'George, who was insolvent, sued on the act of Parliament of 1696, for reduction of an heritable security granted by their debtor in favour of Gib. In order to establish the statutory bankruptcy, the pursuers produced several executions of caption, bearing, “That the messenger had apprehended the debtor; but that, without imprisoning or taking him into custody, he had afterwards liberated him on promise of payment.”
The Court repelled that reason of reduction.
Reporter, Lord Alva. Act. Corbet. Alt. H. Erskine. Clerk, Home.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting